On-Line Legal Research

Click Here

Ignorance of the Law is NO EXCUSE!

( email from Author of"How to Win" Step-by-Step Self-Help Course )
Jurisdictionary

• If "ignorance of the law is no excuse" then knowing how to find official law that will decide the outcome of your case is critical to winning!
  
   Fortunately, the "law of your case" is much simpler than you might imagine and easy to find! Most cases are won or lost on very few "laws", perhaps a single statute and 3-4 appellate court decisions interpreting how that statute applies to the facts.
  
  If you had to go to court 30 years ago, before personal computers and the internet, you'd have to dig through the dismally dry and boring stacks of thousands of look-alike books in a law library (if you could find one nearby). Back then, winning a lawsuit required litigants to spend hour-upon-hour turning dusty pages, pulling down piles of books to spread on the library table next to their yellow pad in what was often a fruitless search for the legal support their arguments needed.
  
  All that has changed, thanks to the internet and competition between legal research sites that is driving the price down to a reasonable level where pretty much anyone who needs to do on-line legal research can afford it.
• But, will you know how?
  My course materials on legal research include videos showing actual screen-shots of on-line searches so an average 8th grader with reasonable computer skills will be able to find constitutional provisions, statutes, code, and appellate court opinions to support pretty much any legal argument you can think of.
  These days it's sooo easy to do legal research on-line ... an average 8th grader can do it!
  Instead of digging through thousands of books differing only by the numbers printed on their impressively formidable spines, you can log-on any of the growing number of competent legal databases and, with the flick of a few keyboard fingers find thousands of cases that deal with the issues of your case in seconds!
  
  
  Google® can get you started ... for free!
  But, don't rely on Google® as the final authority. Google® will provide a good start in most cases, but before you go to court to argue how the appellate opinion you found is the final say-so, you need to dig deeper.
  
  My affordable, official, 24-hour step-by-step Jurisdictionary "How to Win in Court" self-help course explains legal research with examples you can try out for yourself. Once you finish the course you'll know how to find appellate decisions that favor your cause ... and you'll know how to cite them to the court in proper format. You’ll know how to tell the judge why you should win by citing authorities the judge is required by law to obey: court rules, cases, constitutional provisions, statutes and codes.
  
  
  Clever argument is not enough.
  You cannot win without finding and citing the legal authorities that control judges.
  Those who don’t know how to find and cite legal authority cannot control judges nor win on appeal so they lose  needlessly!
  
   In the heat of your lawsuit battles, you can be certain the other side will cite legal authorities favoring his case.
  
  
  It's essential to winning!
  You must do the same thing … if you want to win.
  
  www.Jurisdictionary.com
  Related Reading: Legal Online Self Help 
  ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
  

    Another Great Document for Your Library--Now Available"Standing in the Shadow of the Law", 4th Ed.

  (Best Reference in Plain English to set up your Law Book)

  
   Learn More>> Click Here

  May you find Strength in Your Higher Power,

   GranPa Chuck

    "We the "Little" People"

      Defend Yourself http://nfpcar.org/Jurisdictionary/

    My Family Reform Blog
    My Family Rights Affiliation 
  
• 
  

How to Argue with Judges!

Arguing with judges is like arguing with baseball umpires. You better know the rules AND HOW TO USE THEM! Here are a few rules from the Official MLB Rulebook: A player is not permitted to step or go into a dugout to make a catch. A player is permitted to reach into a dugout to make a catch. If a player makes a catch outside the dugout and his momentum carries him into the dugout, the catch is allowed as long as the player does not fall in the dugout. Simple enough? But! What if the players and the coaches on one team don't know the rules? What happens then? Will it do that team any good to argue with the umpire? Probably not! And all the %#$@&* will only get you thrown out of the park and possibly grounded for the season! To argue successfully with a baseball umpire or a judge on his bench in the courtroom, you must know the Rules of Court ... and how how to use them to your advantage! It's the bottom of the ninth. Two down. Batter at the plate. The count is three and two. The batter pops a high foul. You push back your catcher's mask and dash toward the dugout to make the catch. The ball hits your glove and you trip on the rim of the dugout and fall in. Scrambling to your feet, you climb back out of the dugout, ball in your upraised hand, triumphant grin on your face. Teammates cheer. Fans roar fanatic approval from the stands. But, the scornful look on the umpire's face and his raspy voice erase your victorious joy. "Foul Ball!" "But, I caught the ball, ump!" The player strides purposely toward the umpire, waving a fist, yelling obscenities, and spitting (of course). Fast behind is the coach, marching menacingly toward the umpire, cap shoved back, fists in the air, also shouting nasties and accusing the umpire of needing a new pair of glasses. The umpire stands firmly behind the plate, hands planted on his hips, and waits for the verbal onslaught. "I caught the foul ball. It's an out!" "It's a foul ball. Period!" the umpire insists. "You must be blind, Ump! It's an out! Game's over. We win! You saw me catch the ball? Jeeter couldn't do any better!" "Maybe not," the umpire insists, "but Jeeter knows the ground rules! You fell in the dugout. Catch doesn't count. Get back behind the plate where you belong!" "But. But. But." If you studied my affordable 24-hour Jurisdictionary lawsuit self-help course, you know that all the "buts" in the world won't do you a bit of good in court! Claiming you're pro se and should be allowed to play by different rules won't help, either! You either learn the rules - and how to use them to your advantage - OR YOU LOSE! Sending emails to friends after you lose or posting hateful comments on the internet complaining "All our courts are corrupt" just marks you as a loser. Learn the official rules and how to use them ... or lose! You can show up in court with all kinds of documents and things that you think are "admissible evidence". You can know the law is on your side. But! If you don't know the rules of evidence and rules of procedure - and how to use them to your advantage - you lose! There will be times when you'll need to argue with the judge about this or that, but do yourself a favor and discover what I learned practicing law in state and federal courts since 1986: unless you know the rules and how to argue the rules effectively, you have no more chance of changing a judge's ruling than the catcher who snags a foul ball in mid-air while falling into the dugout! The Rules RULE! End of story! Losers believe internet fables. Losers get their legal education at the barbershop or on websites or expensive weekend seminars run by people who never practiced law, never went to law school, and don't know mud from sand about the rules of court or how to use them to advantage. Too many good folks believe mythological silver-bullet easy solutions to their legal problems. As a predictable result, they are losing ... when they could be winning! A host of wannabe legal gurus infest the internet and barbershops with half-baked schemes that sound too good to be true ... and, like the old adage says, "If it sounds to good to be true, it probably isn't." You may have heard people claiming you can win by challenging a judge's oath of office, insisting a UCC lien can be used to create collateral for borrowers, insisting banks don't loan "real money", or that you can deny your citizenship and claim to be a "sovereign human being" above the law. It might work in small claims or traffic court ... but it will not carry the day for you in any kind of serious lawsuit or criminal case. Hope in one hand and spit in the other. See which hand gets wet. Learn how to use the rules! It's not expensive, and people who have my course tell us an 8th grader can learn it all in a single weekend. If you have a lawyer, you'll save thousands in legal fees by knowing what the lawyer should be doing ... and you'll maximize your chances for success by making certain the lawyer does what should be done, instead of taking you for a ride to the poorhouse - as happens to so many good people these days. If you don't have a lawyer, you'll know how to stop the opponent's crooked tricks and get the judge on your side! Here is the First Rule of Persuasion from "21 Principles of Persuasion" that may help?: 1. Persuasion is not Manipulation - Manipulation is coercion through force to get someone to do something that is not in their own interest.  Persuasion is the art of getting people to do things that are in their own best interest that also benefit you. HOWEVER,  key is knowing the rules and how to use them! To learn more, go to: www.Jurisdictionary.com ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ "You MUST become and Advocate for Yourself and know the statutes, policies, etc. particular to YOUR Concerns to Defend Yourself and Protect your Precious Family." (Sidenote: Myself and others, when supporting others suggested going to court in anger will NOT win your case.) Also, check out our online Legal Terms>>Go Now ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ May you find Strength in Your Higher Power,  GranPa Chuck   "We the "Little" People"     Defend Yourself http://nfpcar.org/Jurisdictionary/   My Family Reform Blog   My Family Rights Affiliation   ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~   Another Great Document for Your Library--Now Available "Standing in the Shadow of the Law", 4th Ed. (Best Reference in Plain English to set up your Law Book)  Learn More>> Click Here

Finding Favor with Judges ...

This may be a "Tough One" to do since so many feel judges are biased.
HOWEVER....

• Get your way the Right Way!

Having a judge rule against you because he doesn't "like" you isn't a good thing!
It helps to have the judge "on your side".

But!

There's only ONE WAY to get a judge's favor.

• Know what you're doing, do it well, and don't waste the court's time!

• Currying favor with flattery doesn't work. Judges get the "sweet treatment" every day. Trying to butter up a judge with flowery words will work against you. The judge won't respect you. The judge will wonder what you're hiding.

• Challenging a judge's "oath of office" won't win points, either.

• Nor will arguing over flag etiquette or your name in ALL CAPITAL LETTERS.

Know what you're doing, do it well, AND DON'T WASTE THE COURT'S TIME!
The next case coming up may involve a young child whose mother abandoned him, or a little girl with ugly burn scars on her once-pretty face because an uncle thinks it's fun to extinguish cigars on her cheeks!

• Learn how to work within the system, instead of trying to make end-runs around the rules with silly games that the judges are quite familiar with already.
• Learn how to state your position clearly with properly-drafted pleadings, motions, and memoranda.
• Learn why, how, and when to object with solid grounds the court cannot ignore.
• Learn how to examine witnesses.

Show the court that you made an effort to learn what justice requires, instead of wasting everyone's time and patience! 

To assist one, who may be allegedly accused of abuse or neglect, here is an "Index" of state statute summaries, maintained by the Child Welfare Information Gateway (CWIG):

 

Abuse & Neglect ~ Adoption ~ Central Registry ~ Court Hearings ~Definitions ~ Domestic Violence ~ Drug Use ~ Foster Children's Bill of Rights ~ Foster Care ~ Home School ~ Immunity ~ Permancy ~ Placement ~ Records ~ Mandatory Reporting ~ Other Resources ~ Righs of Unmarried Fathers ~ Termination of Parental Rights (TPR)
 Or go Directly to>> CWIG State Statute Search

 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Your children deserve to know "
Learn "How To Win In Court WITHOUT a Lawyer"
... and so do YOU!

_____________________________________________________

Related Reading: Going Pro Se. Is it Right for YOU??

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

  Another Great Document for Your Library--Now Available
"Standing in the Shadow of the Law", Special Ed. What is? Creating Your Own Law Book
Excerpts from this document
Reason for Law Book  ~Using Your Law Book

(Best Reference in Plain English to set up your Law Book)

 Learn More About this Book>> Click Here

Learn "How To Win In Court" ... without a lawyer

 

"Kids for Cash" - Movie Documentary Trailer

04/10/2014-
Kids For Cash made its premiere on Capitol Hill last night! A view from the US Capitol theater before the doors opened to members of congress. Hosted by: Senator Robert Casey & Congressman Tony

Make a difference for kids: LIKE, SHARE & bring Kids For Cash to your community! Visit www.kidsforcashthemovie.com and click "See the Trailer" now.

• Kids For Cash is a riveting look behind the notorious judicial scandal that rocked the nation. Beyond the millions paid and high stakes corruption,
  Kids For Cash exposes a shocking American secret. In the wake of the shootings at Columbine, a small town celebrates a charismatic judge who is hell-bent on keeping kids in line...until one parent dares to question the motives behind his brand of justice.
  This real life thriller reveals the untold stories of the masterminds at the center of the scandal and the chilling aftermath of lives destroyed in the process - a stunning emotional roller coaster.
  - Written by Kids for Cash

 

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Thanks for reviewing this information.
Any comments would be Super.

Remember- If you don't know your Rights,
You have NONE

May you find Strength in Your Higher Power,
GranPa Chuck

Researcher, Editor, Publisher

Blog: Judge's tirade against child welfare caseworkers hits point

Link: http://www.9news.com/news/local/article/329751/680/index.php?do=%2Fuser%2Fregister
This will go down in my memory as one of the angriest and most passionate tirades I've heard

****

With his lip sometimes quivering and furious tone, Judge Chris Melonakis didn't hold back as he unleashed a verbal assault on the Adams County Human Services Department, child welfare caseworkers and their supervisors.
In the ten-minute courtroom barrage, Judge Melonakis called for a grand jury investigation against the department and basically held caseworkers directly responsible for the death of toddler Michael Harris.

• Here's one of the quotes from the video you'll have to watch (at about 8:42):

"It's appalling the level of neglect, not by the mother, which is appalling, but by the state, charged with the care and protection of a child. It is ridiculous. It transcends the boundaries of human decency. Irrespective of the bureaucratic ability to hide behind privacy laws, to hide behind privilege, to make no statements, to try and cover their tracks, knowing the press is going to go away. The stories don't have legs for five years. Judges get rotated out of divisions, so you can come in with a new judge and give him the smiley face and convince him you're doing your job. That administrative review takes years, and years, and years...and children die and bureaucrats still have their jobs. That's the way it works. That's the way the system in this state is set up."

During our Failed to Death coverage, we repeatedly ran into counties claiming "privacy laws" prevented them from talking about a child fatality.
How convenient.
 
We illustrated this obstacle while I profiled the case of a little boy named Andres Estrada. He died despite numerous calls to police and caseworkers about neglect and no supervision in his home.
Adams County wouldn't talk to us about the Estrada case, and deferred comment to the state.
Counties want local control of their caseworkers and human services departments. And they make a good argument that they are more familiar with what services families need at their local level. Makes sense.

 However, when a county makes a mistake, and a child dies, it doesn't want the local accountability. It doesn't want to answer to the public or press. It draws the privacy law curtains, and escapes scrutiny.
If counties want to operate their own human services departments, they should be transparent at the local level so mistakes and errors can be fixed. That's just good government.

Who are privacy laws protecting? Children?

If only the dead could have their say.

Have a comment or tip for investigative reporter Jeremy Jojola? Call him at 303-871-1425 or e-mail him
jeremy.jojola@9news.com

(KUSA-TV © 2013 Multimedia Holdings Corporation)
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Please Like and Share.

Thanks, Gran Pa Chuck

• Research & Development>> http://rscrapz.com/rWeb/Publication.html
• Books to Trade/Sell/Buy>> http://rscrapz.com/rBooks 
• Questions/eMail>> granpachuck99@gmail.com

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

  Another Great Document for Your Library
Now Available
"Standing in the Shadow of the Law", Special Edition.

(Best Reference in Plain English to set up your Law Book)

Judge Watch - Featured Site

Here is a featured site, one may want to visit.

It is vital that ALL of us are Responsible for OUR ACTIONS.

However, and unfortunately, THOSE IN LEGAL POWER are Acting "Under the Color of Law"

Introductory definition>> "In U.S. law, the term color of denotes the “mere semblance of legal right”, the “pretense or appearance of” right; hence, an action done under color of law colors (adjusts) the law to the circumstance, yet said apparently legal action contravenes the law.^[1] Under color of authority is a legal phrase used in the United States^[2] indicating a person is claiming or implying the acts he or she is committing are related to and legitimized by his or her role as an agent of governmental power, especially if the acts are unlawful." Read More

Featured Site

SECOND WEEKLY SPECIAL Event May 29, 2013

  A national, nonpartisan,
nonprofit citizens' organization
documenting how judges break the law
and get away with it.

Our Mission . . .

To improve the quality of our judiciary by removing political considerations from the judicial selection process and by ensuring that the process of disciplining and removing judges is effective and meaningful.
 

What We Do . . .
 

• Educate the public about the paramount importance of the judiciary and its role in protecting our constitutional form of government.
   
• Document the nature and extent of judicial incompetence, abuse, and dishonesty and the failure of judicial conduct commissions and screening panels to protect the public.
   
• Network judicial activists and legal reform groups around the country to promote citizen involvement, concerted action, and protection for judicial "whistleblowers".
   
• Track media coverage of issues of judicial selection and discipline, working with reporters and editors to provide accurate coverage.
   
• Testify before public and private bodies involved in judicial issues.
   
• Initiate and support legal action in the public interest to advance the goal of a quality judiciary, free from political influence.

Reforming Juvenile Justice: A Developmental Approach - Final Book Now Abailable

Is REFORM Even Possible???

Reforming Juvenile Justice: A Developmental Approach Adolescence is a distinct, yet transient, period of development between childhood and adulthood characterized by increased experimentation and risk-taking, a tendency to discount long-term consequences, and heightened sensitivity to peers and other social influences. A key function of adolescence is developing an integrated sense of self, including individualization, separation from parents, and personal identity. Experimentation and novelty-seeking behavior, such as alcohol and drug use, unsafe sex, and reckless driving, are thought to serve a number of adaptive functions despite their risks. Research indicates that for most youth, the period of risky experimentation does not extend beyond adolescence, ceasing as identity becomes settled with maturity. Much adolescent involvement in criminal activity is part of the normal developmental process of identity formation and most adolescents will mature out of these tendencies. Evidence of significant changes in brain structure and function during adolescence strongly suggests that these cognitive tendencies characteristic of adolescents are associated with biological immaturity of the brain and with an imbalance among developing brain systems. This imbalance model implies dual systems: one involved in cognitive and behavioral control and one involved in socio-emotional processes. Accordingly adolescents lack mature capacity for self-regulations because the brain system that influences pleasure-seeking and emotional reactivity develops more rapidly than the brain system that supports self-control. This knowledge of adolescent development has underscored important differences between adults and adolescents with direct bearing on the design and operation of the justice system, raising doubts about the core assumptions driving the criminalization of juvenile justice policy in the late decades of the 20th century. It was in this context that the Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention (OJJDP) asked the National Research Council to convene a committee to conduct a study of juvenile justice reform. The goal of Reforming Juvenile Justice: A Developmental Approach was to review recent advances in behavioral and neuroscience research and draw out the implications of this knowledge for juvenile justice reform, to assess the new generation of reform activities occurring in the United States, and to assess the performance of OJJDP in carrying out its statutory mission as well as its potential role in supporting scientifically based reform efforts.

CA Judge’s Bench Book – A Smoking Gun

In many discussions, I’ve directed many to our NFPCAR legal webpage referring to Judge’s Bench Book. Also, in this post I have added an image of the section that directs the judges in CA as to what they are supposed to do… And yes it is pretty clear!!!
(Link to Judge's Bench Book Information: http://www.nfpcar.org/Legal/bench/index.htm )


For those who are not familiar of what these are, here is a brief introduction:

“..Simply put,  the best way to say it would be that Judges Bench Books are the instruction manuals on how a Judge can or should rule and/or preside over a case.   The biggest benefit to providing access to the Bench Books is it gives people a chance to have "inside information" to help them better anticipate what they're facing, and possibly help them defend themselves better.  It also shows/proves any incentive that the Judges may have for ruling a certain way.”

Please note, most of this information was put together by Gina, one of our members, who has been a great researcher… I do encourage anyone and/or everyone to send me information on their favorite subject, etc. to add to our NFPCAR site.

Here is Just one of the Issues Relating to Social Security Funding:

The Anatomy of Child Welfare Fraud:
Part 1 - Targeted Case Management 

View Now

**

Seven Forms of Judicial Accountability

Just sharing an email from Zena Crensha, NFOJA Co-Adminstrator Perhaps a KEY thought to this email: National Forum On Judicial Accountability (NFOJA) is not on the frontlines of judicial elections -vs- merit selection debates. But NFOJA is one of very few groups suggesting that private citizens have a constitutional right to oversee state judicial disciplinary processes. It is our belief that the kind of citizen oversight that NFOJA proposes is among the rights reserved to the people by our U.S. Constitution.
If you like some of these thoughts, may want to consider joining this group??

 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~eMail of 05/29/12
Kindly consider our chart setting out the seven (7) basic forms of or avenues to judicial accountability. These are the ways that judges may be held accountable for judicial acts.



As you can see, there is a cluster of people in the navy blue section for elections; the lime green section for discipline; and the grey section for academic review. These are the areas of judicial accountability that average Americans can or could substantially control.

Are you determined to keep or assert that control? Would you believe that many good government advocates do little to protect or enhance that control, even as they fight for increased judicial accountability?!?!?!

Of course, not all of us are part of academia. But we all should be very concerned that across America, the option of judicial elections is being quietly eliminated. To understand why average Americans should be outraged by that development, read Why Merit Selection of State Court Judges Lacks Merit by Matthew Schneider, Volume 56 Wayne L. Rev. 609 (2010)

National Forum On Judicial Accountability (NFOJA) is not on the frontlines of judicial elections -vs- merit selection debates. But NFOJA is one of very few groups suggesting that private citizens have a constitutional right to oversee state judicial disciplinary processes. It is our belief that the kind of citizen oversight that NFOJA proposes is among the rights reserved to the people by our U.S. Constitution.

Imagine the impact of judges knowing their conduct on the bench may be evaluated by trained, randomly selected private citizens as opposed to judicial colleagues or other institutional actors or even hand-picked private citizens. Such is the goal of NFOJA’s proposed “Citizen Panels On Judicial Misconduct Act”. Such appears to be the mandate of our U.S. Constitution’s Tenth Amendment and the rights it reserves to We the People.

You may not do most of your activism through NFOJA, but please encourage others to join; become an active part of our online networks; and consider becoming an active NFOJA member.

Thank you.

Zena Crenshaw-Logal and
Dr. Andrew D. Jackson
NFOJA Co-Adminstrators
http://50states.ning.com/
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Related Reading:

• You Can Control Judges 

From our NFPCAR Web Site

• Other Links on Judges
• Judges' Bench Guide
• Search Information on our Site

So are You a Concerned Citizen?
JOIN
National Forum On Judicial Accountability

You Can Control Judges

You must learn how to force the judge to see that the appellate courts that can reverse his decisions will reverse his decisions on appeal if he doesn't rule in your favor.

Below is one of the many emails received from Jurisdictionary .

Ignorance of the Law is NO EXCUSE!

( email from Author of"How to Win" Step-by-Step Self-Help Course )
Jurisdictionary

You dare not hope to win until you learn what this Tips & Tactics newsletter teaches about controlling trial level judges.

Otherwise, the judge will rule as he pleases, confident you don't know how to get his decisions reversed on appeal.

Unless you follow the step-by-step Jurisdictionary method and force the judge to see he will be reversed on appeal if he doesn't rule in your favor, justice will be whatever the judge wants it to be.
Your objective is always to: force the judge to see that the appellate courts that can reverse his decisions will reverse his decisions on appeal if he doesn't rule in your favor.

• Losers miss this point ... and lose!
• Trial judges are not legal authority!
• Appellate courts are!

The U.S. Constitution is not controlling law. What appellate courts say the U.S. Constitution means is controlling law.
Statutes are not controlling law. What appellate courts say statutes mean is controlling law.

Only controlling law controls judges.

Appellate court opinions are the legal authority that controls trial level judges!

You may disagree with this. Many do and lose needlessly. I want you to win, but truth is unaffected by what you believe. Only truth is true. Nothing else is. Appellate court opinions are controlling law in this nation and every nation that follows our English system of justice.

Trial judges fear being reversed on appeal. That's what keeps them straight. That's why it's essential to learn how to force the judge in your case to see that the appellate courts that can reverse his decisions will reverse his decisions on appeal if he doesn't rule in your favor.

No trial judge wants an appellate court to publish an official written opinion telling the world he was wrong!

Knowing how to control judges is the secret to winning and is explained step-by-step in my popular 24-hour self-help Jurisdictionary course.
What you believe is controlling law means nothing.

Don't believe me?

Ok. Tell a judge your personal opinions about the law and how he should apply it and rule in your favor. See how far it gets you!

The only opinions that count in court are the published opinions of appellate court justices who stand in judgment of trial level judges and have power to reverse lower court decisions.

This nation (and all others that follow our English justice system) is run by lawyers who sit as justices on appellate courts! The buck stops in court, not at the Whitehouse, Congress, or state legislature. If you believe otherwise, you are mistaken.

Your legal opinions (no matter how clever or persuasive and no matter how many tens of thousands agree with you in emails or on the internet) count for nothing in court.

Controlling judges is what wins lawsuits, and judges are controlled only by appellate court opinions!

Order the case-winning step-by-step Jurisdictionary self-help course now, if you don't already have it, and learn how to control judges ... or lose!

www.Jurisdictionary.com

Related Blog Post: Legal Research - Ignorance is NO Excuse

Another Great Site: Legal Online Self Help 

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

  Another Great Document for Your Library--Now Available
"Standing in the Shadow of the Law", 4th Ed.

(Best Reference in Plain English to set up your Law Book)

 Learn More>> Click Here

May you find Strength in Your Higher Power,

 GranPa Chuck

  "We the "Little" People"

    Defend Yourself http://nfpcar.org/Jurisdictionary/

  My Family Reform Blog
  My Family Rights Affiliation