Friday, May 24, 2013

Judge Watch - Featured Site

Here is a featured site, one may want to visit.
It is vital that ALL of us are Responsible for OUR ACTIONS.
However, and unfortunately, THOSE IN LEGAL POWER are Acting "Under the Color of Law"

Introductory definition>> "In U.S. law, the term color of denotes the “mere semblance of legal right”, the “pretense or appearance of” right; hence, an action done under color of law colors (adjusts) the law to the circumstance, yet said apparently legal action contravenes the law.[1] Under color of authority is a legal phrase used in the United States[2] indicating a person is claiming or implying the acts he or she is committing are related to and legitimized by his or her role as an agent of governmental power, especially if the acts are unlawful." Read More
Featured Site

  A national, nonpartisan,
nonprofit citizens' organization
documenting how judges break the law
and get away with it.
Our Mission . . .
To improve the quality of our judiciary by removing political considerations from the judicial selection process and by ensuring that the process of disciplining and removing judges is effective and meaningful.
 

What We Do . . .
 

  • Educate the public about the paramount importance of the judiciary and its role in protecting our constitutional form of government.
     
  • Document the nature and extent of judicial incompetence, abuse, and dishonesty and the failure of judicial conduct commissions and screening panels to protect the public.
     
  • Network judicial activists and legal reform groups around the country to promote citizen involvement, concerted action, and protection for judicial "whistleblowers".
     
  • Track media coverage of issues of judicial selection and discipline, working with reporters and editors to provide accurate coverage.
     
  • Testify before public and private bodies involved in judicial issues.
     
  • Initiate and support legal action in the public interest to advance the goal of a quality judiciary, free from political influence.

Thursday, May 23, 2013

Reforming Juvenile Justice: A Developmental Approach - Final Book Now Abailable

Is REFORM Even Possible???
 
Final Book Available Now
Reforming Juvenile Justice: A Developmental Approach
Download Free PDF Buy This Book Now
Adolescence is a distinct, yet transient, period of development between childhood and adulthood characterized by increased experimentation and risk-taking, a tendency to discount long-term consequences, and heightened sensitivity to peers and other social influences. A key function of adolescence is developing an integrated sense of self, including individualization, separation from parents, and personal identity. Experimentation and novelty-seeking behavior, such as alcohol and drug use, unsafe sex, and reckless driving, are thought to serve a number of adaptive functions despite their risks.
Research indicates that for most youth, the period of risky experimentation does not extend beyond adolescence, ceasing as identity becomes settled with maturity. Much adolescent involvement in criminal activity is part of the normal developmental process of identity formation and most adolescents will mature out of these tendencies. Evidence of significant changes in brain structure and function during adolescence strongly suggests that these cognitive tendencies characteristic of adolescents are associated with biological immaturity of the brain and with an imbalance among developing brain systems. This imbalance model implies dual systems: one involved in cognitive and behavioral control and one involved in socio-emotional processes. Accordingly adolescents lack mature capacity for self-regulations because the brain system that influences pleasure-seeking and emotional reactivity develops more rapidly than the brain system that supports self-control. This knowledge of adolescent development has underscored important differences between adults and adolescents with direct bearing on the design and operation of the justice system, raising doubts about the core assumptions driving the criminalization of juvenile justice policy in the late decades of the 20th century.
It was in this context that the Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention (OJJDP) asked the National Research Council to convene a committee to conduct a study of juvenile justice reform. The goal of Reforming Juvenile Justice: A Developmental Approach was to review recent advances in behavioral and neuroscience research and draw out the implications of this knowledge for juvenile justice reform, to assess the new generation of reform activities occurring in the United States, and to assess the performance of OJJDP in carrying out its statutory mission as well as its potential role in supporting scientifically based reform efforts.
Download Free PDF
Buy This Book Now

Tuesday, May 21, 2013

Calling Co-Sponsors for Parent Rights Amendment


ParentalRights.org logo
Sign the Petition Donate Volunteer Learn More View Online
May 21, 2013
Parental Rights Amendment Now Accepting Cosponsors
The Parental Rights Amendment to the United States Constitution is back in the U.S. Congress! Rep. Mark Meadows (R-NC) will be the lead sponsor this term, with support from Rep. Trent Franks (R-AZ). The Amendment has not yet been introduced, but has been through drafting and is now ready for circulation. This means it can be shared with your congressman and Rep. Meadows can begin to gather original cosponsors!

We are excited about our chances of moving the Amendment through the House this session, since supporting cosponsor Franks is the chairman of the Constitution Subcommittee of the House Judiciary Committee. This is the subcommittee the PRA will need to go through to reach the full Judiciary Committee, so his leadership there will help to pave a smooth path for its progress.

We are also excited about our behind-the-scenes progress in the Senate, and hope to confirm our lead sponsor there very soon.

In the newest iteration of the Amendment we have chosen to add a clarifying section to make sure the rights of every parent of a public school student will be protected as they were before the terrible Fields v. Palmdale ruling of the Ninth Circuit in 2005.

In that decision, the Court determined that parental rights “end at the school door.” (A later en banc decision of the Ninth Circuit softened the wording, but did not significantly change its meaning.) Such a termination of parental rights every time a child enters school is simply unacceptable.

This new section of the Parental Rights Amendment will ensure that parents have “the right to make reasonable choices in public schools for one’s child.” This will preserve the right, for instance, to opt one’s child out of a session the parents might find objectionable. It will not give parents any power over the school’s curriculum or what is taught to anyone else’s child. (The same section also provides an explicit protection of the right to choose public, private, religious, or home schooling.)

You can find the full text to the newly updated amendment here.

Action Item: Please Call Your Congressman
Now it is time to contact your congressman and ask him or her to sign on as an original cosponsor of the Amendment. This should be a friendly call, especially if your congressman has sponsored the PRA in the past.

Your message can be as simple as the following: “Representative Mark Meadows of North Carolina is gathering original cosponsors for the Parental Rights Amendment, and I would like to encourage my congressman to sign on. The language has been drafted but not introduced, so there isn’t a bill number yet, but you can contact Patrick Fleming in Rep. Meadows’ office for a copy of the resolution or to sign on as a cosponsor. Thank you.”

In many cases, your congressman and his staff will appreciate the call. In any event, please be courteous when you call; we are building relationships that can help the Amendment pass in the long run.

To find your congressman’s phone number, click on your state at ParentalRights.org/States. Be sure to call their Washington, D.C., office.

Then, you can check our website to see when your Congressman has signed on. We will keep the list as current as possible so that you can know when calls are no longer needed.

Why not also use this opportunity to encourage your friends and family to get involved with the Parental Rights Amendment by asking them to join you in calling Congress? Then, send them to our website to sign the petition so they can get these notices for themselves.

This would also be a good time, if you are able, to make a generous donation to ParentalRights.org to help us keep this exciting effort charging forward throughout the summer.

Thank you for taking action today as we prepare for the introduction of the PRA in Congress!

Sincerely,

Michael Ramey
Director of Communications & Research

Share This Online
 

Donate

Join the Discussion

Tuesday, April 30, 2013

Second Opinion? We're Taking Your Child - Opinion from Parental Rights.org

It is most refreshing to get similar reactions and conclusions from varying and reliable sources. Those of Parental Rights are one of my valued sources. If you agree, do pass on. 
May you find Strength in Your Higher Power,
 Granpa Chuck
My Affiliation
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
to me
ParentalRights.org logo

Sign the Petition Donate Volunteer Learn More View Online


April 30, 2013

Second Opinion? We're Taking Your Child
One would think having the approval of a doctor and even clearance from the local police would be enough to protect a parent from having their baby taken away over cries of “medical neglect.” In this case, one would be wrong.

Anna and Alex Nikolayev of Sacramento lost custody of their 5-month-old son last week when they decided to seek a second opinion before having the baby undergo heart surgery. Though a second doctor found it safe to release the boy into their custody, and though an investigating officer also cleared the family to go home, the child was taken the next day.


Timeline of Events
Little Sammy has had a heart murmur since birth, which the parents have been closely monitoring along with a doctor at Sutter Memorial Hospital. So when Sammy developed flu-like symptoms a couple of weeks ago, his parents took him to Sutter again as a precaution. During his stay, a couple of incidents occurred that concerned the parents (such as administrating an anti-biotic to fight his virus). So when Sammy was put in the pediatric intensive care and talk turned to heart surgery, the parents wanted a second opinion.

Unable to secure release from the doctors at Sutter Memorial, the parents took Sammy from the hospital anyway – prompting an automatic call to Child Protective Services and the Sacramento Police – and drove straight to neighboring Kaiser-Permanente Hospital.

Doctors there determined that Sammy was healthy enough to go home with his parents. The doctor noted in his report that he saw no cause for concern in leaving Sammy in Anna and Alex’s care. (Corrective heart surgery is in Sammy’s future; the parents do not dispute this fact.)

Police met the family at Kaiser, checked out the smiling baby, read the doctor’s report, and agreed that Sammy was in no danger. The Nikolayev family was free to go.

That was April 23, 2013. The following day, a CPS worker and Sacramento Police arrived at the family’s home and removed the baby, carrying him back to Sutter Memorial, where he was held in “protective custody.” Though the parents got to visit Sammy to feed him three times a day for one supervised hour, they had to wait until Monday for a hearing.

By then, coverage had gone international, with media outlets in Germany and in the family’s native Russia paying close attention. Ominously, local ABC station KXTV reports, “CPS said they were overwhelmed with the amount of attention by the media into the case, and could therefore take longer than usual to render a decision on Sammy's fate.” (emphasis added)


How Would the PRA Help?
Traditionally, the Supreme Court has recognized the “fundamental liberty interest of natural parents in the care, custody, and management of their child,” found in the Fourteenth Amendment’s “Due Process” clause. Santosky v. Kramer, 455 U.S. 745 (1982) This protection, however, has been lost on Sacramento CPS. It is also being weakened through judicial erosion in the courts.

Passage of the Parental Rights Amendment will provide parents an explicit constitutional protection; otherwise, they’ll have to rely on the courts, hoping they will continue to interpret the Fourteenth Amendment as they traditionally have (but increasingly no longer do). And the PRA will allow organizations like CPS to know exactly what the rules are that they must follow.

The liberty of parents to direct the upbringing, education, and care of their child is a fundamental right. Neither the United States nor any State shall infringe this right without demonstrating that its governmental interest as applied to the person is of the highest order and not otherwise served.

These two sentences would make clear that CPS cannot take a child away unless it is prepared to prove that the child was in danger caused by abuse or neglect. In this case, it would increase the chances that common sense would prevail and baby Sammy would have gotten to stay home safe and sound with his mom and dad.


Action Items
Yesterday the county and the family's lawyers reached an agreement to return Sammy to his parents' care, but with stipulations limiting their choices in medical treatment. (See video here.) CPS will continue to be a part of Sammy's life at least until the next hearing, set for May 28. While we rejoice in the reunification of this family, we grieve over the unnecessary loss of liberty this couple has suffered for no reason. We must make sure such abuses do not continue unchecked. Here is how you can help:

1. Share this email and the story of Sammy with everyone you know. Encourage them to support the Parental Rights Amendment and to sign on here.

2. Donate to support ParentalRights.org as we fight to protect the rights of parents like Anna and Alex. Help us make stories like Sammy’s a thing of the past.

3. Stay vigilant. Word is that the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities will be back in the Senate Foreign Relations Committee this month. Watch for alerts letting you know when and how to focus your energies on stopping that dangerous treaty. Click here for the current appeal to call your senators today.

Sincerely,

Michael Ramey
Director of Communications & Research


P.S. – Due to the timely nature of this breaking news story, the Common Core article scheduled for today will be sent on Thursday of this week.

Friday, April 19, 2013

Good News for Montana-Creation of Ombudsman Office



April, 17, 2013

The OMBUDSMAN Bill in Montana HB-76 Passed it's final vote today 38-12.
Comments added by a contributor: “This is the first Bill passing, after over 1,200 complaints were received from families that CPS in Montana wronged, stole their children and made monetary profit by doing so.”
·         Has Montana created a bill that will represent a True, Unbiased, and Third Party?
Only time will tell since the Ombudsman Offices created in other states certainly haven’t been helpful for the most part. 

Think about it. How many Acts, Statutes, etc. have been created with good intentions, but unfortunately, haven’t been followed and/or the general public isn’t even aware of these statutes? 

For starters in our Family Law Arena, it is highly recommended that we do our homework and start here>> State Statute Index of Summaries.

Needless to say, many in CPS are opposed to this bill.

FYI, here is the bill in its entirety with amendments. Plus one may want to use some of these ideas for their state to either amend or establish an Ombudsman Office.

My primary concern, of this bill, is that will $500,000, initially proposed be enough funding?? After all, I am sure that the agency budget is much, much more: 

2013 Montana Legislature
HOUSE BILL NO. 76
INTRODUCED BY C. PEASE-LOPEZ
BY REQUEST OF THE CHILDREN, FAMILIES, HEALTH, AND HUMAN SERVICES INTERIM COMMITTEE
A BILL FOR AN ACT ENTITLED: "AN ACT CREATING AN INDEPENDENT OFFICE OF THE CHILD AND FAMILY OMBUDSMAN; DESCRIBING THE DUTIES AND POWERS OF THE OFFICE; ESTABLISHING A SPECIAL REVENUE ACCOUNT FOR THE RECEIPT OF GRANTS, GIFTS, AND BEQUESTS TO THE OFFICE; PROVIDING AN APPROPRIATION; AMENDING SECTION 41-3-205, MCA; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE."
BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF MONTANA:
NEW SECTION.  Section 1.  Office of child and family ombudsman established. (1) There is an office of the child and family ombudsman.
(2) As used in this part, "ombudsman" means the office of the child and family ombudsman.
(3) The ombudsman is allocated to the department of justice for administrative purposes only as prescribed in 2-15-121.
NEW SECTION.  Section 2.  Purpose and intent. The legislature finds that:
(1) an independent, impartial, and confidential ombudsman can serve to protect the interests and rights of Montana's children and families; and
(2) an independent, impartial, and knowledgeable ombudsman can work collaboratively with the department to strengthen the department's child and family services.
NEW SECTION.  Section 3.  Appointment -- term. (1) The governor, with the consent of the senate, shall appoint an individual who is a resident of this state and is qualified by training and experience to perform the duties of the ombudsman as provided in [section 6].
(2) The appointment must be made from a list of at least three persons prepared and submitted by a committee consisting of:
(a) two attorneys appointed by the Montana bar association;
(b) two district court judges appointed by the chief justice of the Montana supreme court;
(c) one medical doctor appointed by the Montana medical association;
(d) one psychologist appointed by the Montana psychological association;
(e) one social worker appointed by the Montana chapter of the national association of social workers;
(f) one person appointed by the governor as a representative of private children's agencies;
(g) one person appointed by the governor as a representative of the general public; and
(h) one person appointed by the director of the department.
(3) The ombudsman holds office for a term of 5 years and continues to hold office until a successor is appointed.
NEW SECTION.  Section 4.  Staff. The ombudsman may select, and the department of justice shall hire as provided in 2-15-121, necessary staff to carry out the provisions of [sections 1 through 8]. Staff must be under the supervision of the ombudsman.
NEW SECTION.  Section 5.  Independence. The ombudsman acts independently of the department of public health and human services in the performance of the duties of the office.
NEW SECTION.  Section 6.  Duties. The duties of the ombudsman are to:
(1) ensure that each child under the jurisdiction of the department, and in appropriate cases an individual interested in the child's welfare, is apprised of the child's rights under the law;
(2) take all possible action, including but not limited to programs of public education and advocacy, to pursue the legal, civil, and special protections of children;
(3) help interested parties obtain any information pertaining to the case work and procedures of the department that they are entitled to under the law;
(4) review complaints and investigate, in accordance with the powers provided for in [section 7] and with procedures adopted and made publicly available by the ombudsman, those complaints that indicate, in the opinion of the ombudsman, that a child might be in need of assistance from the ombudsman;
(5) investigate, in accordance with the powers provided for in [section 7] and with procedures adopted and made publicly available by the ombudsman, the circumstances relating to the death of any child who has received services from the department;
(6) when the ombudsman's investigation related to a complaint or a death appears to warrant it, share the relevant findings, subject to the disclosure restrictions and confidentiality requirements provided in [section 7], with individuals or entities that are legally authorized to receive, inspect, or investigate reports of child abuse or neglect;
(7) provide training and technical assistance to guardians ad litem and special advocates appointed by a district court to represent children in proceedings before that court;
(8) periodically review the procedures used by the department with a view toward the rights of children;
(9) recommend to the department changes in its procedures and support the department's implementation of the changes with appropriate training or technical assistance; and
(10) annually submit to the governor and the legislature a detailed report analyzing the work of the ombudsman and any recommendations resulting from it.
NEW SECTION.  Section 7.  Powers of ombudsman. (1) The ombudsman has, subject to subsection
(2), the power to:
(a) communicate privately with any child under the jurisdiction of the department;
(b) inspect, copy, or subpoena department records, including case notes, correspondence, evaluations, videotapes, and interviews pertaining to any child under the jurisdiction of the department who is alleged to be abused or neglected;
(c) request that individuals or entities outside the department that are legally authorized to receive, inspect, or investigate reports of child abuse or neglect provide information related to a complaint or death that the ombudsman is investigating;
(d) file amicus curiae briefs on behalf of a parent or child;
(e) take appropriate steps to see that persons are made aware of the services and procedures of the office of the child and family ombudsman, its purpose, and how it can be contacted; and
(f) apply for and accept grants, gifts, and bequests of funds from other states, federal and interstate agencies and independent authorities, and private firms, individuals, and foundations for the purpose of carrying out the duties of the ombudsman.
(2) The ombudsman is subject to the disclosure restrictions and confidentiality requirements provided in 41-3-205.
NEW SECTION.  Section 8.  Special revenue account. (1) There is a child and family ombudsman account in the state special revenue fund established pursuant to 17-2-102.
(2) Funds received pursuant to [section 7(1)(f)] must be deposited in the account and expended in accordance with the provisions of the grant, gift, or bequest.
Section 9.  Section 41-3-205, MCA, is amended to read:
41-3-205.  Confidentiality -- disclosure exceptions. (1) The case records of the department and its local affiliate, the local office of public assistance, the county attorney, and the court concerning actions taken under this chapter and all records concerning reports of child abuse and neglect must be kept confidential except as provided by this section. Except as provided in subsections (7) and (8), a person who purposely or knowingly permits or encourages the unauthorized dissemination of the contents of case records is guilty of a misdemeanor.
(2)  Records may be disclosed to a court for in camera inspection if relevant to an issue before it. The court may permit public disclosure if it finds disclosure to be necessary for the fair resolution of an issue before it.
(3)  Records, including case notes, correspondence, evaluations, videotapes, and interviews, unless otherwise protected by this section or unless disclosure of the records is determined to be detrimental to the child or harmful to another person who is a subject of information contained in the records, may be disclosed to the following persons or entities in this state and any other state or country:
(a)  a department, agency, ombudsman, or organization, including a federal agency, military enclave, or Indian tribal organization, that is legally authorized to receive, inspect, or investigate reports of child abuse or neglect and that otherwise meets the disclosure criteria contained in this section;
(b)  a licensed youth care facility or a licensed child-placing agency that is providing services to the family or child who is the subject of a report in the records or to a person authorized by the department to receive relevant information for the purpose of determining the best interests of a child with respect to an adoptive placement;
(c)  a health or mental health professional who is treating the family or child who is the subject of a report in the records;
(d)  a parent, guardian, or person designated by a parent or guardian of the child who is the subject of a report in the records or other person responsible for the child's welfare, without disclosure of the identity of any person who reported or provided information on the alleged child abuse or neglect incident contained in the records;
(e)  a child named in the records who was allegedly abused or neglected or the child's legal guardian or legal representative, including the child's guardian ad litem or attorney or a special advocate appointed by the court to represent a child in a pending case;
(f)  the state protection and advocacy program as authorized by 42 U.S.C. 15043(a)(2);
(g)  approved foster and adoptive parents who are or may be providing care for a child;
(h)  a person about whom a report has been made and that person's attorney, with respect to the relevant records pertaining to that person only and without disclosing the identity of the reporter or any other person whose safety may be endangered;
(i)  an agency, including a probation or parole agency, that is legally responsible for the supervision of an alleged perpetrator of child abuse or neglect;
(j)  a person, agency, or organization that is engaged in a bona fide research or evaluation project and that is authorized by the department to conduct the research or evaluation;
(k)  the members of an interdisciplinary child protective team authorized under 41-3-108 or of a family group decisionmaking meeting for the purposes of assessing the needs of the child and family, formulating a treatment plan, and monitoring the plan;
(l)  the coroner or medical examiner when determining the cause of death of a child;
(m)  a child fatality review team recognized by the department;
(n)  a department or agency investigating an applicant for a license or registration that is required to operate a youth care facility, day-care facility, or child-placing agency;
(o)  a person or entity who is carrying out background, employment-related, or volunteer-related screening of current or prospective employees or volunteers who have or may have unsupervised contact with children through employment or volunteer activities. A request for information under this subsection (3)(o) must be made in writing. Disclosure under this subsection (3)(o) is limited to information that indicates a risk to children, persons with developmental disabilities, or older persons posed by the person about whom the information is sought, as determined by the department.
(p)  the news media, a member of the United States congress, or a state legislator, if disclosure is limited to confirmation of factual information regarding how the case was handled and if disclosure does not violate the privacy rights of the child or the child's parent or guardian, as determined by the department;
(q)  an employee of the department or other state agency if disclosure of the records is necessary for administration of programs designed to benefit the child;
(r)  an agency of an Indian tribe, a qualified expert witness, or the relatives of an Indian child if disclosure of the records is necessary to meet requirements of the federal Indian Child Welfare Act;
(s)  a juvenile probation officer who is working in an official capacity with the child who is the subject of a report in the records;
(t)  a county attorney, peace officer, or attorney who is hired by or represents the department if disclosure is necessary for the investigation, defense, or prosecution of a case involving child abuse or neglect;
(u)  a foster care review committee established under 41-3-115 or, when applicable, a citizen review board established under Title 41, chapter 3, part 10;
(v)  a school employee participating in an interview of a child by a social worker, county attorney, or peace officer, as provided in 41-3-202;
(w)  a member of a county interdisciplinary child information team formed under the provisions of 52-2-211;
(x)  members of a local interagency staffing group provided for in 52-2-203;
(y)  a member of a youth placement committee formed under the provisions of 41-5-121; or
(z)  a principal of a school or other employee of the school district authorized by the trustees of the district to receive the information with respect to a student of the district who is a client of the department.
(4)  A school or school district may disclose, without consent, personally identifiable information from the education records of a pupil to the department, the court, a review board, the office of the child and family ombudsman, and the child's assigned attorney, guardian ad litem, or special advocate.
(5)  Information that identifies a person as a participant in or recipient of substance abuse treatment services may be disclosed only as allowed by federal substance abuse confidentiality laws, including the consent provisions of the law.
(6)  The confidentiality provisions of this section must be construed to allow a court of this state to share information with other courts of this state or of another state when necessary to expedite the interstate placement of children.
(7)  A person who is authorized to receive records under this section shall maintain the confidentiality of the records and may not disclose information in the records to anyone other than the persons described in subsection (3)(a). However, this subsection may not be construed to compel a family member to keep the proceedings confidential.
(8)  A news organization or its employee, including a freelance writer or reporter, is not liable for reporting facts or statements made by an immediate family member under subsection (7) if the news organization, employee, writer, or reporter maintains the confidentiality of the child who is the subject of the proceeding.
(9)  This section is not intended to affect the confidentiality of criminal court records, records of law enforcement agencies, or medical records covered by state or federal disclosure limitations.
(10) Copies of records, evaluations, reports, or other evidence obtained or generated pursuant to this section that are provided to the parent, the guardian, or the parent or guardian's attorney must be provided without cost."
NEW SECTION.  Section 10.  Appropriation. (1) There is appropriated from the general fund to the department of justice $250,000 for the biennium beginning July 1, 2013. (My concern? Is this really enough money when comparing to the funding of CPS?)
(2) The appropriation must be used for the purposes described in [sections 1 through 8].
NEW SECTION.  Section 11.  Codification instruction. [Sections 1 through 8] are intended to be codified as an integral part of Title 52, chapter 2, and the provisions of Title 52, chapter 2, apply to [sections 1 through 8].
NEW SECTION.  Section 12.  Effective date. [This act] is effective July 1, 2013.
- END -


Latest Version of HB 76 (HB0076.01)
Processed for the Web on December 10, 2012 (12:09pm)
New language in a bill appears underlined, deleted material appears stricken.
Sponsor names are handwritten on introduced bills, hence do not appear on the bill until it is reprinted.
See the statusof this bill for the bill's primary sponsor.
Prepared by Montana Legislative Services
(406) 444-3064
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Sincerely hope that this has been helpful?
Myself and my affiliates have a common goal in mind for the Preservation of Our Families.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
A Statement for Your Consideration

“We are joining forces with all persons affected by Parens Patriae to include parents, extended family, foster parents and father's and mother's rights groups. While this is a difficult endeavor due to various divisions, the focus will be on challenging the system with the unified goals and commonalities that each is suffering under in family courts and through CPS.”
(See Definition: Parens Patriae)
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Here is a link to my Affiliation. So check it out.. And if you find it useful, please support the efforts of a small group, that is just a Speck on this Gigantic Planet