Understanding Lawsuit Anatomy

Below is one of the many emails received from Jurisdictionary .  

As simple as remembering CAT?

( email from Author of"How to Win" Step-by-Step Self-Help Course )
Jurisdictionary

 

Lawsuit Anatomy

Learn lawsuit anatomy by spelling: CAT.
The 3 basic steps of every lawsuit are:.

• Complaint
• Answer
• Trial

Start here, and you'll soon be operating like a pro in court, controlling judges and defeating crooked lawyers.

Of course, there's much more to winning, but it's all easy if you start with basic anatomy: CAT.

• C = Complaint ... Where every case begins. Plaintiff complains by filing a Complaint. He alleges (1) what duty the defendant breached, (2) how the defendant breached the duty, and (3) how the plaintiff suffered damages (or is threatened with damages) as a direct result.

• A = Answer ... Where defendant responds to plaintiff's Complaint by filing an Answer and Affirmative Defenses. In his Answer he admits or denies (or claims he lacks enough knowledge to admit or deny) each separate allegation of the plaintiff's Complaint. In his Affirmative Defenses he alleges facts that (if he can prove them) will relieve him of his obligation to plaintiff.

• T = Trial ... Where the judge (or jury) decides the final verdict by examining admissible evidence, using plain old common sense to decide which facts presented are true, weighing each side's evidence to see which side has the greater weight of evidence, and then applying the law to determine who wins.

>>Plaintiffs file Complaints.
>>Defendants file Answers (and essential "Affirmative Defenses", as you will learn in my course.
>>Judges and juries examine the facts and law at trial to decide who wins.

During the process Motions and Discovery Tools are used by both sides to convince the court who should win.

This is where the fight is - not at trial.
Every winnable case can be won before trial, if you use my case-winning tactics ... all explained in my affordable, official, 24-hour Jurisdictionary "How to Win in Court" self-help course.
For example, there are 3 Motions the defendant can use to avoid filing an answer:

1. Motion to Dismiss
2. Motion to Strike
3. Motion for More Definite Statement

All explained in the course.

At any time after the Complaint is filed, either side may use 5 discovery tools to get facts that may lead to admissible evidence:

1. Admissions
2. Production
3. Interrogatories
4. Depositions
5. Subpoenas and other court orders

Also explained fully in my affordable self-help course.

That's the Anatomy of Every Lawsuit!

It really IS this simple!

---

Learn "How To Win In Court" ... without a lawyer
 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
May you find Strength in Your Higher Power,
GranPa Chuck
Researcher, Editor, Publisher, Collector

Related Reading: Legal Online Self Help 

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

  Another Great Document for Your Library--Now Available
"Standing in the Shadow of the Law", 4th Ed.

(Best Reference in Plain English to set up your Law Book)

 Learn More>> Click Here

Do you have legal problems; and can't afford a lawyer??

>>Do you have legal problems?
>>Can't afford a lawyer?
>>Want to learn how to win in just a few hours and get justice for yourself and your loved ones? Just click the following link and ORDER this amazing legal self-help course. I checked it out, and IT REALLY WORKS!
www.howtowinincourt.com/FrameSet.cfm…

How to Win in Court

Case-Winning Court Procedure Made Easy Win Without a Lawyer - Step-by-Step Only $249( Extra Years Only $89 for Early Renewers)

---

May you find Strength in Your Higher Power,
GranPa Chuck
Researcher, Editor, Publisher, Collector

Make March Rememberance of Nancy Schaefer?

I've got a proposition: How about every year we make sure that "March is Nancy Schaefer Month!"
Please spread Nancy's message to all of your families, friends, groups and acquaintances in honor of this wonderful, Pro-Child, Pro-Family and anti-CPS corruption lady! Let's make sure that nobody can forget her or her message! Thank you.----HopeY

Yes, and unfortunately, Nancy died from an unfortunate death. However, we, as Family, need to focus on the Reform she was seeking as Senator.
  (Download the Senator's Letter, Titled "THE CORRUPT BUSINESS OF CHILD PROTECTIVE
SERVICES", Rev: 09.25.08.  "Also, a Discussion Point brought up in this post on FB, Juvenile Dependency: Breaking The Cycle )
Here is a list of Senator Nancy Schaefer's Major Points:

1. Call for an independent audit of the Department of Family and Children’s Services (DFCS) to expose corruption and fraud.
2. Activate immediate change. Every day that passes means more families and children are subject to being held hostage.
3. End the financial incentives that separate families.
4. Grant to parents their rights in writing.
5. Mandate a search for family members to be given the opportunity to adopt their own relatives.
6. Mandate a jury trial where every piece of evidence is presented before removing a child from his or her parents.
7. Require a warrant or a positive emergency circumstance before removing children from their parents. (Judge Arthur G. Christean, Utah Bar Journal, January, 1997 reported that “except in emergency circumstances, including the need for immediate medical care, require warrants upon affidavits of probablecause before entry upon private property is permitted for the forcible removal of children from their parents.”)
8. Uphold the laws when someone fabricates or presents false evidence. If a parent alleges fraud, hold a hearing with the right to discovery of all evidence.

Senator Nancy Schaefer
50th District of Georgia

---

Learn "How To Win In Court" ... without a lawyer
 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
May you find Strength in Your Higher Power,
GranPa Chuck
Researcher, Editor, Publisher, Collector

PROOF, EVIDENCE, & FACTS: Words the News Media may Miss

Thoughts from Tony V. Zampella

• PROOF, 
• EVIDENCE & 
• FACTS -

 both newscasters and news consumers need to consider this difference at a time when our President trades in gossip and conspiracy theories. 

I offer this framework as a reminder that helps me and may be necessary for the next four years.
EVIDENCE is more general and can include something that is told by someone. It is accepted only on belief. There may or may not be truth in all evidence. Think circumstantial evidence. 50 people in a room might see the same evidence and reach difference conclusions. 

FACT is a truth that can be proven. The stock market dropped 100 points (facts) is a provable truth. 50 people in a room would all agree on this statement. 

PROOF requires a standard. A puddle of water outside (fact) might be evidence of rain, but it might also be the result of a broken water valve. Proof might include more that three puddles along two streets (facts), plus a witness (evidence), plus wet leaves on trees lining the street (facts) in the area.

 Here's another way to see this:

• Consensus of evidence = FACT.
• Consensus of fact = PROOF.
• Consensus of proof = consensus of evidence + consensus of fact.

The strength of each is significant. Someone saying something on Twitter is gossip; if they include the article where they saw it, that includes some evidence; if that article includes specific testimony, research, or surveys this includes some facts. In most cases, none of this is proof.

 We tend to act on everything as if it is proof when it is usually gossip (hearsay), or at best, evidence.

---

Learn "How To Win In Court" ... without a lawyer
 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
May you find Strength in Your Higher Power,
GranPa Chuck
Researcher, Editor, Publisher, Collector

File a Complaint Against a Psychiatrist.

Google "file a complaint against a psychiatrist".

Or just Google the two words "psychiatrist" & "complaint".

Who rules?

The PsychSearch complaint form! http://www.psychsearch.net/complaints/

Which explains the robust number of complaints being filed against USA psychiatrists!

Please help us get #1 DONE on THE PLAN!

THE PLAN

Simplicity:

1. A psych patient fills out the online complaint form at PsychSearch.net: 

http://www.psychsearch.net/complaints/  (So, put that link on your websites, blogs,

social media or just do something old-fashioned like talk to somebody! Use whatever

expertise you have, make the complaint form known!) 

2. The completed form is delivered directly to the psych's licensing agency. Kablam!

(States won't lift a finger until they receive a complaint!)  The beauty of this form is

that it gets delivered STRAIGHT to the psych's licensing agency.  No delays, No vias.

3. When the State takes action and the discipline records become public we scoop

them up and post them online for the world to see. In our estimation, the only way

to expose psychiatrists is with documentation!  Plop the psych records on the table. 

Argument is over!

4. The records are flipped to the press. (they can't keep their hands off this stuff!

(Sex, big names, big money, controversy, violence, etc.)

More psych patients see the news stories and say "that ain't nuthin! you should hear

what my psychiatrist did!"  and then files his/her own complaint. (Step 1)

Steps 1, 2, 3, 4 are continuously repeated.

You already know the horror stories.

So, do Step #1 and do Earth a favor.

Peace.

Ken Kramer

PsychSearch.net

Make this psychiatrist complaint form well-known: http://www.psychsearch.net/complaints/

"It is a simple and deadly formula.  Less steps than baking a cake."

---

Learn "How To Win In Court" ... without a lawyer
 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
May you find Strength in Your Higher Power,
GranPa Chuck

Researcher, Editor, Publisher, Collector